Executive Summary
The strategic landscape of modern conflict has evolved dramatically, validating and amplifying the concepts of Fifth Generation Warfare (5GW) as articulated in 2018. Originally defined by the pervasive integration of information and narrative warfare as a precursor and shaping activity within the grey zone, 5GW has transitioned from a theoretical framework to an observable, persistent reality. This complex, multi-dimensional environment necessitates a profound shift in how intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities are conceived and employed. Modern Decision Drive ISR is not merely an enhancement of traditional intelligence functions; it is an imperative, demanding the seamless integration of physical, information, and cognitive domains to achieve decision dominance.
Since 2018, operations and activities worldwide have underscored the critical importance of these concepts. The proliferation of sophisticated information and cyber warfare campaigns, the enduring and expanding nature of grey zone operations, and the transformative role of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT) have reshaped the battlespace. Adversaries now routinely target the human mind and societal cohesion, operating below the threshold of conventional conflict to achieve strategic aims. This report reviews the foundational tenets of 5GW, updates them with contemporary examples, and establishes a comprehensive framework for Decision Drive ISR. It highlights the necessity of adapting capabilities, training, and organizational structures to effectively operate and prevail in this perpetually contested environment, where understanding and influencing the cognitive dimension are paramount for strategic advantage.
1. Revisiting Fifth Generation Warfare: An Evolving Paradigm
The 2018 conceptualization of Fifth Generation Warfare (5GW) proved remarkably prescient, anticipating a fundamental shift in the nature of conflict. This paradigm moved beyond traditional kinetic engagements to emphasize the profound impact of information and narrative as central elements of warfare. The intervening years have not only validated these initial observations but have also seen an intensification and diversification of these dynamics, making the principles of 5GW more relevant than ever in understanding contemporary global competition.
1.1 The Enduring Relevance of Influence and Narrative Warfare
In 2018, 5GW was defined as fundamentally driven by information and narrative, underscoring the "centrality of influence" and the critical importance of shaping the narrative within the cognitive mission space.1 Physical action, within this framework, was understood to primarily serve a supporting role, designed to adjust or reinforce the prevailing narrative.1 This emphasis has been overwhelmingly confirmed by global events since 2018, where information has been weaponized with unprecedented intensity to instigate and exacerbate conflict and instability.1
Numerous examples illustrate this trend. The Russo-Ukrainian War, for instance, has been characterized by Russia's deliberate perpetuation of narratives, such as claims of Ukrainian violence against Russian-speaking populations, to justify its invasion.2 This involved publishing vast amounts of disinformation to manipulate search results and public perception.2 Similarly, documented Russian interference in foreign elections, including the 2016 and 2024 US presidential elections, is widely described as a form of information warfare, designed to sow division and influence political outcomes.2 Beyond direct state-on-state conflict, actors like Russia and China actively promote specific narratives, as seen in their efforts to manipulate British public opinion and create division within the United States by amplifying pro-Palestinian influencers.2 The 2023 Doppelgänger Operation, attributed to Russia, further exemplifies this, utilizing cloned Western news websites to disseminate disinformation about NATO and Ukraine.3
This strategic emphasis on information extends to what is now explicitly termed cognitive warfare. Russia's application of cognitive warfare in Ukraine, for example, aims to shape Western decision-making, obfuscate Russian objectives, and compel the world to accept Russian premises.4 This comprehensive approach involves leveraging all available platforms—including traditional media, conferences, international frameworks, diplomatic channels, and individual actors—as conduits for transmitting preferred narratives.4
A significant development observed is how the 2018 concept of the "invisible touch"—influence exerted without physical presence, often through cyber capabilities 1—has transformed into a ubiquitous and pervasive reality. Foreign malign influence (FMI) is no longer confined to targeting national governments; it increasingly extends to corporations and local communities, creating a constant, multi-directional flow of influence operations.5 This pervasive presence means the battlespace is perpetually contested, demanding continuous monitoring and a fundamental shift from reactive defence to proactive, continuous counter-influence.
Furthermore, the initial understanding that narrative was central has deepened to recognize that narrative control represents the new strategic terrain. Adversaries like Russia and China are not merely influencing existing narratives; they are actively creating and polarizing them to achieve specific strategic goals.2 This goes beyond conventional propaganda, involving the exploitation of existing societal divisions 1, the sophisticated use of AI-driven content 3, and even the impersonation of legitimate sources.6 The ultimate objective is to undermine institutions, foster mistrust, and degrade a nation's ability or will to retaliate.1 Consequently, prevailing in the "cognitive mission space" 1 requires not just countering false narratives but actively shaping and defending a nation's own narrative, often in real-time, across diverse platforms and target audiences. This necessitates a deep integration of strategic communications with intelligence functions.
1.2 The Grey Zone: A Persistent Battleground Below the Threshold
The 2018 papers accurately identified the "grey zone" as an "indistinguishable space between peacetime and conflict," where adversaries operate deliberately below the threshold of declared war.1 The concept of an "insidious creep" that makes it difficult to establish clear "Red Lines" for intervention was a foundational observation.1 This characterization has been unequivocally confirmed, with the grey zone now recognized as the "new normal" in international relations 8, defined by coercion without combat and influence without direct attribution.3
Russia's hybrid war tactics in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine serve as a prime illustration, utilizing low-cost, ambiguous methods to achieve strategic objectives without resorting to conventional military force.8 China's comprehensive "campaign against Taiwan" offers another compelling case study, described as a "textbook on subversion, cyber and political harassment".9 This campaign involves a range of activities, including air and maritime incursions, military exercises, the deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), broadcasting "news" to Taiwanese audiences, and widespread cyberattacks, all meticulously designed to remain below the threshold of open warfare.9 The use of marine survey vessels as a "cover" for military activities further exemplifies the deliberate blurring of lines.9 Grey zone activities are characterized by their gradual unfolding, frequent non-attributability, reliance on legal and political justifications, predominant use of non-military tools, and exploitation of existing weaknesses.9 Their aim is to wear down an opponent while carefully avoiding larger-scale confrontation.10
While the 2018 papers described grey zone activities as a "pre-cursor, shaping activity" 1, post-2018 observations indicate a more enduring state. The objectives of hybrid warfare are not necessarily to achieve a traditional "victory" in war or peace, but rather to produce instability, erode democratic institutions, and foster political polarization.10 This suggests a departure from a linear "phases of conflict" model 1 towards a more cyclical or persistent state of strategic competition. This implies that strategic planning must now account for prolonged engagement in the grey zone, requiring sustained, integrated responses that blend diplomatic, informational, military, and economic tools, rather than solely preparing for a kinetic "Phase 5".1 The "boiling frog" analogy, where a situation escalates imperceptibly until it is too late to react, remains more relevant than ever in this context.1
A critical element of grey zone success is the deliberate weaponization of ambiguity. The inherent difficulty in tracing responsibility for attacks 10 and the reliance on "low attributable" capabilities 1 are central to this strategy. Adversaries skilfully leverage this ambiguity to shift the accusation of "aggressor" onto the victim, thereby tempting the victim to refrain from action to avoid being accused of "escalation".9 This is a calculated tactic designed to paralyze decision-making. Countering grey zone operations therefore demands enhanced attribution capabilities, rapid response mechanisms that are highly adaptable to ambiguous threats, and a willingness to act decisively below traditional thresholds of conflict, even when the adversary's hand is not fully revealed.
1.3 Beyond State Actors: The Expanding Cast of Opponents and Influencers
The 2018 analysis correctly identified a departure from the classical state-on-state warfare model, acknowledging the rise of asymmetric threats from non-state entities in 4GW. In 5GW, this blurring of lines was projected to intensify, encompassing a diverse array of actors including "proxy forces, 'useful idiots,' and empowered citizens".1 This diversification has been fully realized in modern conflicts, where hybrid warfare involves a broad spectrum of participants beyond traditional state militaries, such as "proxies, hackers, criminal gangs, drug traffickers, paramilitaries, terrorists, and private contractors".10
Foreign malign influence actors, often aligned with nation-states, increasingly exploit domestic actors to launder and manipulate content, reaching audiences who are unaware they are receiving foreign-originated information.6 Criminal hacktivists and financially motivated criminals also contribute significantly to this complex threat landscape.11 The "birth of the uncontrolled influencer" 1 has indeed ushered in a new era of global manipulation, where individuals, often unwittingly, can become instrumental in an adversary's influence network.
A crucial understanding emerging from this evolution is that the "enemy" is increasingly a network, not a hierarchy. The 2018 paper noted that the traditional "manoeuvrist approach" of striking command and control nodes and "cutting off the head" would be ineffective against self-healing networks.1 This implies that the threat is diffuse and decentralized, rendering conventional targeting strategies less effective. The proliferation of "useful idiots" and empowered citizens 1 means that individuals, often without full awareness of their role, can become critical nodes in an adversary's influence network. Consequently, ISR and operational planning must shift from a focus on hierarchical structures to understanding and disrupting complex, often decentralized, networks of influence. This demands new analytical tools and a broader, more nuanced understanding of the human terrain.
Furthermore, the blurring of combatant and non-combatant roles, noted in 2018 as making the distinction "irrelevant" 1, is not merely an accidental byproduct but a deliberate adversary strategy. By operating in the grey zone with non-military tools and through proxies, adversaries intentionally complicate response efforts and exploit legal and ethical dilemmas.10 This tactic forces democratic nations into a difficult position, often making them reluctant to use kinetic force against ambiguous threats. This necessitates a fundamental re-evaluation of the laws of armed conflict within the context of 5GW, alongside the development of non-kinetic, legally justifiable countermeasures that can operate effectively in this deliberately blurred space.
Table 1: Evolution of Fifth Generation Warfare Concepts (2018 vs. Post-2018)
Centrality of Influence
2018 Concept: Defining element of 5GW; dynamic balancing of manoeuvre, fires, info activities, outreach. Information weaponized. 1
Post-2018 Reality & Evolution: Overwhelmingly validated; information weaponized exponentially to create conflict. Cognitive warfare aims to shape decision-making and accept adversary premises. 1
Key Implication for Decision Driven ISR: Requires continuous, proactive counter-influence capabilities and integrated strategic communications.
The Invisible Touch
2018 Concept: Influence/effect without physical presence using unmanned/cyber capabilities & global networks. Politicians risk-averse, reliant on low-attributable/stand-off. 1
Post-2018 Reality & Evolution: Evolved from capability to pervasive, ubiquitous reality. Foreign malign influence targets governments, corporations, local communities, demanding continuous monitoring. 5
Key Implication for Decision Driven ISR: Demands a shift from reactive defence to proactive, persistent counter-influence operations across all domains.
Role of Narrative
2018 Concept: Critical importance; physical action supports narrative. Enables actors to develop, direct, control agenda (moral, social, economic, political, military). 1
Post-2018 Reality & Evolution: Confirmed as new strategic terrain. Adversaries actively create, polarize, and exploit narratives using AI-driven content and impersonation. 2
Key Implication for Decision Driven ISR: Requires active shaping and defence of national narratives, integrating strategic communications with real-time intelligence.
The Grey Zone / Constant Conflict
2018 Concept: Indistinguishable space between peacetime and conflict; insidious creep, difficult to set 'Red Lines'. Death of 'war', birth of 'constant conflict'. 1
Post-2018 Reality & Evolution: Persistent state of competition, not just precursor. Aims to undermine institutions, erode democracy, create polarization, without seeking traditional 'victory'. 8
Key Implication for Decision Driven ISR: Necessitates sustained, integrated responses blending DIME tools; requires a "peacetime" posture inherently competitive and defensive.
Adversary Nature
2018 Concept: Blurring of state/non-state actors; includes proxy forces, 'useful idiots', empowered citizens. Opponent ambiguous. 1
Post-2018 Reality & Evolution: Diversified to include hackers, criminal gangs, PMCs. The "enemy" is a decentralized, self-healing network rather than a hierarchy. 10
Key Implication for Decision Driven ISR: Requires ISR and operational planning to focus on disrupting complex, diffuse networks, moving beyond traditional hierarchical targeting.
Relationship with Technology
2018 Concept: Often considered hardware/software (5G aircraft, sensor/command/info/effects grids). 1
Post-2018 Reality & Evolution: Technology (AI/ML, cyber tools) amplifies capabilities, but the core is human cognition. Cyber is a critical cross-domain enabler. 3
Key Implication for Decision Driven ISR: Requires significant investment in AI/ML for data processing and predictive modelling, alongside a strong emphasis on human-machine teaming and ethical considerations.
Blurring of Combatant/Non-Combatant
2018 Concept: Distinction becomes irrelevant; enemies will no longer wear black. 1
Post-2018 Reality & Evolution: Deliberate adversary strategy to complicate response and exploit legal/ethical dilemmas, forcing democracies into inaction. 10
Key Implication for Decision Driven ISR: Necessitates re-evaluation of laws of armed conflict and development of non-kinetic, legally justifiable countermeasures.
2. The Contemporary Landscape: Operations and Activities Since 2018
The period since 2018 has provided extensive real-world evidence of the concepts introduced in the 2018 5GW papers. Information, hybrid, cyber, and cognitive warfare are no longer theoretical constructs but integral components of geopolitical competition, manifesting in diverse and impactful ways across the globe.
2.1 Information Warfare and Disinformation Campaigns: Global Case Studie
Information warfare has solidified its position as a central component of modern conflict, actively shaping public opinion and serving to justify strategic actions.13 The pervasive nature of these campaigns is evident in numerous global incidents.
The Russo-Ukrainian War offers a stark example. Russia systematically perpetuated narratives, such as claims of Ukrainian government violence against its Russian-speaking population, to build support for its invasion.2 This involved publishing vast amounts of disinformation online, which was then picked up in search results, effectively manipulating the information environment.2 Concurrently, Ukrainian forces demonstrated adaptability by exploiting deficiencies in Russian communications, allowing them to eavesdrop and disrupt critical conversations.2 Beyond direct military conflict, Russia's documented interference in US elections, including both the 2016 and 2024 presidential campaigns, highlights the strategic use of disinformation to target political figures and sow division within the adversary's society.2 Similarly, China's information operations, often executed by the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) affiliates, involve extensive propaganda and influence operations aimed at influencing Taiwanese sovereignty and US elections.2 Both China and Russia have been observed promoting pro-Palestinian influencers to manipulate British public opinion and exacerbate divisions within the US.2
A particularly concerning development is the expansion of foreign malign influence (FMI) campaigns beyond traditional governmental targets. These campaigns increasingly target US corporations, aiming to tarnish reputations, cause financial losses, and foster internal dissatisfaction.5 They also extend to state and local communities within the US, designed to polarize politics and undermine confidence in democratic institutions.6 These foreign actors frequently exploit domestic individuals and groups to "launder" and manipulate content, ensuring it reaches American audiences who remain unaware of its foreign origin.6
The advent of AI has significantly amplified the scale and sophistication of disinformation. The 2023 Doppelgänger Operation, attributed to Russia, utilized cloned Western news websites to push disinformation about NATO and Ukraine, demonstrating a new level of deception.3 Countering such sophisticated attacks now relies heavily on AI-driven sentiment analysis to detect coordinated narratives, network-mapping tools to identify bot-driven amplification, and fact-checking AI to cross-reference claims against verified data sources in real-time.3
The widespread nature of information warfare reveals that it is a multi-vector, multi-layered attack. It extends far beyond traditional media, permeating social media platforms, cloned websites, and even leveraging domestic actors to disseminate narratives.2This signifies a highly sophisticated, adaptive, and pervasive threat that operates on multiple fronts simultaneously, from national policy discussions down to local community dynamics. Consequently, effective counter-information warfare requires a whole-of-society approach, integrating efforts across government, the private sector, and civil society, while leveraging advanced AI tools for detection and analysis across diverse platforms.
2.2 Hybrid Warfare in Practice: Blurring Lines of Conflict
Hybrid warfare has become a defining characteristic of modern conflict, deliberately blurring the lines between traditional peace and war. Russia's application of hybrid warfare is particularly notable, emphasizing the manipulation of the information environment and swaying public opinion to achieve objectives.8 This approach also involves the economic employment of conventional forces and the generation of persistent pressure and chaos across the spectrum of peace and war paradigms.8This strategy was successfully tested and refined in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine, demonstrating how objectives can be achieved without direct, large-scale conventional military force.8
The ongoing situation with Taiwan serves as a compelling case study. China's grey zone campaign against Taiwan is characterized as a "textbook on subversion, cyber and political harassment," involving a range of activities meticulously designed to remain below the threshold of declared war.9 These include air and maritime incursions across the median line of the Taiwan Strait, military exercises in waters off Taiwan, flying UAVs over offshore islands, broadcasting "news" to Taiwanese audiences, and cyberattacks on governmental agencies and critical infrastructure, such as undersea cables.9 The use of marine survey vessels and hydrographic survey ships as a "cover" for military activities further exemplifies the deliberate ambiguity.9
A critical observation is that the goals of hybrid tactics often extend beyond traditional notions of "victory." Instead of seeking a definitive end to conflict, they aim to undermine the legitimacy of institutions, erode trust in administrations, create political polarization, and destroy social cohesion.10 This approach allows states to achieve political, economic, or other objectives without closing the door to negotiation or diplomatic relations, often at a considerably lower cost than conventional warfare.10Moreover, hybrid warfare involves a wide array of actors beyond state militaries, including proxies, hackers, criminal gangs, drug traffickers, paramilitaries, terrorists, and private military contractors like the Wagner Group.10
The persistent nature of hybrid tactics, which deliberately avoid open conflict 10, confirms that the "death of war" as a distinct, declared state has given way to the birth of perpetual competition. This implies that the strategic environment is one of continuous rivalry rather than clear phases of peace and war. The low cost and significant strategic advantage offered by hybrid tactics ensure their proliferation and intensification.10 Therefore, nations must develop a "peacetime" posture that is inherently competitive and defensive against hybrid threats. This requires continuous intelligence gathering and proactive, non-kinetic responses, rather than passively waiting for a conventional trigger.
2.3 Cyber Warfare: A Critical Enabler Across All Domains
Cyber warfare has evolved from isolated hacking incidents into highly coordinated campaigns that target critical infrastructure, government systems, and private enterprises. It is now unequivocally recognized as a fundamental tool of geopolitical strategy, used by nation-states to achieve their objectives.13
Cyber capabilities serve as a powerful force multiplier in modern conflict, augmenting kinetic operations by crippling an adversary's ability to communicate, move goods and services, and even survive harsh environmental conditions.13 The interconnected nature of modern society means that cyberwarfare's impact extends far beyond military targets, affecting everyday civilian life.13 For instance, North Korean cyber spies have expanded their infiltration operations to target European defence and government organizations, engaging in espionage and revenue generation through extortion.12 India has also seen a significant increase in cyberattacks on its government entities between 2019 and 2023.12 Russia's deployment of cyber weapons to augment kinetic war in Ukraine further illustrates this integration, making it difficult to isolate the costs and adverse effects solely attributable to cyber capabilities.13
Furthermore, cyber warfare is deeply integrated with information warfare, often encompassing psychological manipulation and propaganda that is amplified through digital platforms and social media to shape public opinion.13 This close synergy means that cyber operations are not merely a separate domain but are integral to enabling information warfare (through disinformation distribution and data leaks), hybrid warfare (via critical infrastructure disruption and espionage), and cognitive warfare (by manipulating digital platforms).2 A holistic defence strategy must therefore view cyber security as foundational to national security, extending protection not just to military networks but also to critical civilian infrastructure and the broader information ecosystems from persistent, integrated cyber-enabled attacks.
2.4 Cognitive Warfare: The Battle for the Mind
Cognitive warfare represents a new frontier in conflict, one that does not primarily involve kinetic weapons but instead plays out in the digital space, manipulating minds and spreading chaos without a single shot being fired.7 The ultimate goal of this form of warfare is to change the attitudes, behaviour, and ultimately the will of the target audience.1 Success in the contemporary mission space, therefore, increasingly resides with the side that wins the cognitive domain.1
Russia's strategic application of cognitive warfare exemplifies this. The Kremlin employs these tactics to diminish the will and capability of those resisting it, with the overarching aim of making the world accept its premises. This includes propagating narratives about Russia's inevitable victory in Ukraine and its entitlement to desired spheres of influence, even in territories it does not militarily control.4
The tactics and tools employed in cognitive warfare are sophisticated and varied. They include distraction and paralysis techniques designed to confuse adversaries and divert attention from critical threats, often by fabricating fake crises or focusing on non-existent weaknesses.7 They also aim to weaken alliances and create internal discord.7 The 2016 DNC email leaks, which caused significant disruption in US politics by deepening divisions, are a clear historical example of cognitive warfare in action.7Russia's Reflexive Control theory, which uses disinformation to delay or distort responses and weaken national unity, is another key tactic.7 Crucially, AI-driven technologies, such as deepfakes and information laundering, are elevating cognitive manipulation to unprecedented levels, creating highly convincing false narratives that make it increasingly difficult to distinguish between reality and fabrication.7
Cognitive warfare also expertly exploits inherent human biases. The "bandwagon effect," where individuals believe something simply because it is popular or widely accepted, and "selective attention," which draws focus to emotionally charged or fear-inducing content, are frequently leveraged. This was evident during the COVID-19 pandemic, where fear of the virus made populations more susceptible to sharing and believing false information without verification.7
The user's 2018 concept of a "cognitive mission space" 1 is now explicitly recognized as the primary target in this form of warfare.4 This implies that strategic success hinges on understanding and manipulating human psychology, biases, and decision-making processes, rather than relying solely on physical destruction. Consequently, military and intelligence training must incorporate advanced cognitive science, behavioural economics, and psychological operations, moving beyond traditional intelligence analysis to truly understand and influence the human terrain. The rise of AI-driven tools like deepfakes and information laundering 7 directly enhances an adversary's ability to create highly convincing false narratives, making it exponentially harder for individuals to distinguish reality from fabrication and exploiting inherent human cognitive biases.7 Therefore, counter-cognitive warfare requires not only technological solutions, such as AI for detection, but also a concerted effort to build societal resilience through media literacy and robust fact-checking mechanisms to inoculate populations against sophisticated manipulation.
Table 2: Key Post-2018 Information and Hybrid Warfare Case Studies
Russo-Ukrainian War
Russia, Ukraine
Key 5GW Tactics Employed: Disinformation, narrative manipulation, cyber operations, exploiting comms deficiencies, economic pressure, proxy forces
Observed Effects: Justified invasion, manipulated public opinion, disrupted communications, destabilised regions
Russian Interference in US Elections
Russia
Key 5GW Tactics Employed: Disinformation campaigns, narrative manipulation, cyber operations (email leaks), exploiting divisions
Observed Effects: Political polarisation, undermined confidence in democratic institutions, influenced voter preferences
China's Grey Zone Campaign vs. Taiwan
China, Taiwan
Key 5GW Tactics Employed: Air/maritime incursions, military exercises, UAVs, broadcasting propaganda, cyberattacks (undersea cables), election interference, digital disinformation
Observed Effects: Erosion of warning times, political harassment, subversion, division within society
Foreign Malign Influence (FMI) on US Corporations/Communities
Russia, China, Iran, Unknown
Key 5GW Tactics Employed: Disinformation, malinformation, artificial promotion, exploiting domestic actors, smearing opponents
Observed Effects: Damaged reputations, lost business, worker dissatisfaction, political polarisation at local levels
2023 Doppelgänger Operation
Russia
Key 5GW Tactics Employed: AI-driven disinformation, cloned Western news websites, coordinated narratives
Observed Effects: Pushed anti-NATO/Ukraine narratives, amplified false information
COVID-19 Pandemic Disinformation
Various (State/Non-State)
Key 5GW Tactics Employed: Fear-inducing content, exploiting selective attention, false narratives amplified by social media
Observed Effects: Increased belief/sharing of false information, reduced critical thinking, societal division
3. Decision Driven ISR: Integrating the Three Dimensions of Battlespace
The evolving nature of 5GW necessitates a radical transformation of ISR, moving beyond traditional collection and analysis to a comprehensive "Decision Driven ISR." This advanced framework demands the seamless integration of understanding across the physical, information, and cognitive dimensions of the battlespace to enable rapid, accurate, and impactful decision-making.
3.1 The Physical Dimension: Evolving ISR for Tangible Effects
ISR has historically focused on the physical battlespace, providing crucial situational awareness regarding geographical positions, adversary forces, and tangible actions.1 This traditional role remains indispensable for confronting conventional military threats and maintaining a position of advantage.1 The physical dimension encompasses information as a tangible entity, manifesting in bits, atoms, and material presence, requiring ISR to understand information storage, transmission, and the material constraints influencing its representation.17
Modern ISR capabilities are undergoing significant modernization to meet these demands. For instance, the US Army is developing the High Accuracy Detection and Exploitation System (HADES) as its next-generation airborne ISR system, designed to provide advanced signals intelligence and synthetic aperture radar/moving target indicator capabilities.18 Future visions include stratospheric platforms for high-altitude, low-signature ISR, enabling penetration into highly defended operational areas.18
A critical understanding in 5GW is the profound connection between physical actions and their cognitive effects. Every physical action, from seemingly minor changes like combat helmet adjustments on foot patrols to major military operations, inherently influences perception within the mission space.1 This "observer effect" is fundamental: what an actor does, and how it is perceived, can have significant, often unintended, cognitive consequences.1 For example, President George W. Bush's "crusade" remark after 9/11, intended to galvanize domestic support, inadvertently alienated parts of the international community due to its historical connotations.1
This observation, that physical actions are cognitive signals, is fundamental. Even traditional military activities, such as incursions or exercises 9, convey information and shape perceptions, whether intentionally or not. This means that physical ISR must not only track movements and capabilities but also meticulously analyse the information conveyed by those physical activities.17The implication for Decision Drive ISR is that it must integrate physical intelligence with a deep understanding of its potential cognitive impact. This requires commanders to consider the narrative implications of every physical action, not solely its kinetic effect, to avoid unintended strategic consequences.
3.2 The Information Dimension: Navigating and Shaping the Digital Ecosystem
The information dimension constitutes the technological realm of networks where credible information is generated, resides, travels, and evolves.19 This domain is now as keenly contested in modern warfare as the traditional physical dimension, serving as a primary battleground for influence and control.19
Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT) has rapidly emerged as the "front line" in detecting, attributing, and countering grey zone operations.3 Its utility stems from its reliance on legally available and publicly accessible information, including social media, news articles, official documents, and "grey literature" like corporate records and government reports.20 OSINT applications are diverse and critical: it aids in disinformation detection through AI-driven sentiment analysis, network mapping to identify bot amplification, and fact-checking AI.3 It is instrumental in tracking covert military movements by geolocating user-generated content like TikTok videos, analysing commercial satellite imagery, rail-traffic data, and location signals.3 Furthermore, OSINT is vital for cyber threat attribution and exposing sanctions evasion by tracking illicit financing, cryptocurrency laundering, and suspicious maritime activities.3 Despite its immense value, the sheer volume of data inherent in the information dimension presents a challenge, risking "paralysis by analysis" for intelligence professionals.21
The centrality of information, identified in the 2018 papers 1, has evolved to demonstrate that the information dimension is the "new terrain" for asymmetric advantage. Adversaries, even those with smaller defence budgets, leverage this domain for significant strategic gains.8 This is where low-cost, high-impact tactics thrive, making it a critical domain to contest and control. Therefore, substantial investment in advanced OSINT capabilities, including AI-driven automation, and comprehensive training for warfighters at all levels 3 are paramount to gain and maintain information superiority.
Furthermore, the infrastructure that carries information is itself a primary target. The physical manifestation of information includes Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence (C4I) systems, telecommunications networks, and media sectors.17 Adversaries are actively targeting critical infrastructure, such as allegedly severing underwater cables 9, and exploiting digital platforms.3 This means that protecting information infrastructure, both physical and digital, is as crucial as defending traditional military assets, necessitating robust cybersecurity, physical security, and resilience measures.
3.3 The Cognitive Dimension: Understanding and Influencing Human Will
The 5GW mission space is fundamentally cognitive, with the ultimate objective being to change the attitudes, behaviour, and ultimately the will of the target audience.1 Success in this environment resides with the side that effectively "wins the cognitive space".1 Measuring cognitive effects is inherently complex and ambiguous, as cognition is influenced by a multitude of factors, including culture, history, social and political organization, economic conditions, unconscious biases, sensory perception, and access to information.1 To navigate this complexity, militaries must draw lessons from masters of social understanding, such as political lobbyists and the commercial advertising sector.1
The distinction between the "cognitive arena"—"what we know"—and the "affective arena"—"how our message will be received"—is crucial for effective decision-making.1 The affective arena involves understanding the underlying attitudes and drivers that will shape how a decision or message is processed by a target audience.1 Intelligence staffs must intensify their efforts in Human Terrain Analysis (HTA) and stakeholder analysis to deeply understand human networks and identify key nodes within them.1
A profound implication is that decision-making itself is a cognitive vulnerability. The purpose of cognitive warfare is to manipulate public perception and influence citizens 22, often by deliberately creating doubt, mistrust, and disloyalty.1 This directly targets the decision-making processes of both leaders and populations, aiming to induce "distraction and paralysis".7 Consequently, Decision Drive ISR must not only provide intelligence
to decision-makers but also intelligence about the decision-making environment itself, including adversary attempts to influence or paralyze friendly decision-making. This requires a sophisticated understanding of cognitive biases and vulnerabilities within one's own systems and those of the adversary.
Furthermore, the affective domain functions as the "lens" for strategic communication. The 2018 paper aptly introduced the "affective arena" as a filter through which decisions and messages are received.1 This means that even a perfectly crafted message or a strategically sound decision can be distorted or misunderstood if the affective domain of the target audience is not correctly defined.1 President Bush's "crusade remark" 1 serves as a classic illustration of misjudging the affective domain, leading to unintended negative consequences despite positive intent. Therefore, ISR must provide deep cultural, psychological, and sociological insights to inform strategic communications and influence operations, ensuring messages resonate positively and achieve desired cognitive effects, rather than unintended negative ones.
Table 3: ISR Integration Across Physical, Information, and Cognitive Dimensions
Physical
Tangible presence; traditional battle space; military actions convey information; understanding storage/transmission of physical data.
Traditional SIGINT, IMINT, GEOINT; advanced sensor technologies (SAR/MTI); analysis of physical posture and activities.
Desired ISR Output: Common Operating Picture (COP); adversary force disposition; infrastructure status; physical messaging analysis.
Impact on Decision-Making: Situational Awareness; informing kinetic operations; understanding overt signalling; assessing physical impact on cognitive domain.
Information
Technological realm of networks; information resides, travels, evolves; keenly contested for asymmetric advantage; infrastructure is a target.
OSINT (social media, news, grey literature); cyber threat intelligence; network analysis; AI-driven sentiment analysis; fact-checking.
Desired ISR Output: Narrative analysis; disinformation detection; cyber threat attribution; illicit network mapping; information flow diagrams.
Impact on Decision-Making: Information Superiority; informing counter-influence strategies; protecting critical information infrastructure; early warning of grey zone activities.
Cognitive
Battle for the mind; influence attitudes, behaviour, will; success resides in winning cognitive space; affected by culture, biases, history.
Human Terrain Analysis (HTA); stakeholder analysis; behavioural modelling; psychological profiling; public opinion polling; media consumption analysis.
Desired ISR Output: Sentiment heatmaps; perception mapping; predictive behaviour models; vulnerability assessments (cognitive biases); understanding adversary decision calculus.
Impact on Decision-Making: Situational Understanding; informing influence operations; mitigating cognitive vulnerabilities; shaping strategic communication; achieving decision dominance.
4. Advanced Capabilities for Decision Dominance
Achieving decision dominance in the complex environment of 5GW necessitates significant advancements in both technological capabilities and organizational structures. This involves a fundamental shift towards integrated Multi-Domain ISR (MDISR), leveraging the transformative power of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, while ensuring the continued centrality of the human element.
4.1 Multi-Domain ISR (MDISR) and Multi-Domain Command and Control (MDC2)
The traditional model of individual, stove-piped ISR capabilities—separate for Air, Land, and Maritime forces—is no longer adequate for the demands of 5GW.1 These capabilities must evolve to become pan-divisional and cross-domain, enabling a holistic view of the battlespace. The inherent complexity and interconnected nature of the 5GW mission space make Multi-Domain Command and Control (MDC2) an essential framework for success.1 MDISR serves as the foundational pillar for MDC2, providing the comprehensive information and intelligence required for effective decision-making across all domains.1 Indeed, MDISR is understood to be the very mechanism that creates the cognitive domain itself.1
The integration challenge is substantial: it requires synthesizing diverse intelligence sources such as Human Intelligence (HUMINT), Signals Intelligence (SIGINT), Geospatial Intelligence (GEOINT), and Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT) into a single, usable picture.21 This is no longer optional but essential for maintaining an advantage over threats.21 Effective multi-intelligence (multi-INT) systems demand robust, interoperable software, dynamic visualization tools, and streamlined human interfaces to ensure that fused intelligence is immediately useful to analysts and operators.21 Emerging systems like the US Army's High Accuracy Detection and Exploitation System (HADES), its next-generation airborne ISR system, exemplify this integration by combining signals intelligence and synthetic aperture radar capabilities.18 Furthermore, NATO's multi-domain operations approach aims to identify and maximize the unique strengths of each force category, enabling a more effective response to evolving threats.24
The development of MDC2 and MDISR is not merely a tactical upgrade but a strategic imperative. The research highlights that Multi-Domain Operations (MDO) and MDISR are direct responses to "emerging technologies and threats from state and non-state actors".24 Nations are recognizing the urgency of this transformation; for instance, India's push for a "National Mission for a Joint ISR-Strike Command" that bypasses traditional procurement processes underscores the strategic nature of this integration, aiming for "battlefield dominance and operational superiority".23 This implies that achieving Decision Dominance in 5GW requires a fundamental, holistic shift across doctrine, organization, training, materiel, leadership, personnel, and facilities (DOTMLPF-P) to enable seamless multi-domain integration, moving decisively beyond service-specific silos.
4.2 The Transformative Role of AI, Machine Learning, and OSINT in ISR
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) are proving transformative in ISR, primarily by enabling the efficient processing of vast amounts of complex data. These technologies are crucial for tasks such as object detection via neural networks, anomaly detection in pattern-of-life deviations, and predictive modelling of adversarial behavior.21 This capability significantly accelerates the shift from raw data interpretation to pre-emptive action.21
In the cognitive domain, AI plays a pivotal role in countering and conducting influence operations. AI-driven sentiment analysis, network-mapping tools, and fact-checking AI are vital for detecting coordinated disinformation campaigns in the information environment.3 Conversely, adversaries employ AI-driven technologies like deepfakes and information laundering to elevate cognitive manipulation, creating highly convincing false narratives.7 AI is also driving a broader shift towards outcome-driven decision intelligence, integrating deterministic execution of business rules, probabilistic modelling of machine learning, and generative inference of large language models into unified decisioning platforms.25 This enables real-time, context-aware decisioning, enhanced transparency, and explainability in complex scenarios.25 Real-world applications, such as Israel's use of AI algorithms (e.g., 'Gospel,' 'Where's Daddy?,' and 'Lavender') in Gaza, demonstrate how AI synthesizes data from all ISR sources—satellite imagery, drone footage, SIGINT, and human monitoring—to identify targets and support decision-making.15
OSINT's role has also been significantly amplified by these technological advancements. It is now critical for tracking illicit financing, cryptocurrency laundering, and sanctions evasion.3 AI-driven OSINT automation can drastically reduce analysis time, transforming hours of work into minutes.3
The sheer volume and complexity of multi-domain data 21 make human-only analysis insufficient. AI and ML are explicitly shown as essential for processing, exploiting, and disseminating intelligence.14 They enable predictive targeting and automated resource allocation 23, thereby accelerating the OODA (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act) loop.1 This implies that nations must prioritize significant investment in AI/ML research, development, and integration within their ISR architectures, including the development of sovereign AI capabilities like Defence Large Language Models 23, to achieve and maintain decision superiority.
However, while AI offers immense capabilities, the importance of the human-in-the-loop (HITL) remains paramount for trust and ethical considerations. Concerns about the "dehumanization of ISR" and associated ethical issues have been raised, particularly regarding AI-assisted airstrikes that rely heavily on algorithmic assessments.15 The need for "trust calibration" in human-machine teaming is also critical, as is mitigating the risks of "overreliance on imperfect assessments" and inherent "cognitive biases".14This underscores that AI should augment, rather than replace, human judgment, especially in complex ethical or ambiguous grey zone scenarios. Therefore, developing AI-driven ISR requires a strong emphasis on human-machine teaming, explainable AI, robust governance frameworks, and continuous training to ensure human oversight, mitigate biases, and build trust in automated decision support systems.
4.3 Challenges and Opportunities in Achieving Decision Dominance
Achieving Decision Dominance in the 5GW environment presents a unique set of challenges and opportunities. A primary challenge lies in managing the sheer volume and diversity of data generated across multiple domains. This requires significant investment in data collection, storage, dissemination, processing, and exploitation capabilities, alongside the development of robust, highly connected, and resilient networks.1 The risk of "paralysis by analysis"—where an overwhelming amount of data hinders rather than aids decision-making—is a tangible concern that must be actively mitigated.21
Furthermore, the effectiveness of Decision Drive ISR is not solely dependent on the quality of intelligence; it also hinges on the capabilities of the decision-maker themselves. Even with the best intelligence, an uneducated or un-oriented decision-maker may make incorrect choices.1 This highlights the critical importance of continuous training for intelligence operators, commanders, and decision-makers to orient them to the complexities of the 5GW environment.1
Significant opportunities exist through public-private collaboration. Leveraging the agility and innovation of commercial technology firms can provide real-time access to cutting-edge tools and improve the speed of intelligence delivery.3 India's burgeoning defence startup ecosystem, for instance, is actively developing AI-driven ISR solutions that can be integrated into military networks.23
The trends in decision-driven intelligence emphasize not only technological prowess but also the critical importance of governance and adaptability. There is a growing demand for "responsible AI governance and transparency" and a shift towards systems that are "agile and outcome-focused".25 This indicates that technological superiority alone is insufficient; effective governance frameworks, continuous performance tracking, and the ability to rapidly adapt decision logic are essential for sustained advantage. Consequently, beyond acquiring advanced tools, organizations must invest in the processes and policies that ensure the ethical, accountable, and continuously optimized use of AI and integrated ISR, fostering a culture of adaptability and continuous learning.
Table 4: AI/ML and OSINT Applications in Modern ISR
AI-driven Sentiment Analysis
Specific Application in ISR: Disinformation detection; identifying coordinated narratives; monitoring social media, news cycles, forums.
Impact on 5GW/Decision Driven ISR: Enhanced attribution of influence operations; real-time understanding of public perception.
Associated Challenges/Considerations: Data volume; accuracy of sentiment interpretation; adversarial manipulation of sentiment.
Deepfakes & Information Laundering
Specific Application in ISR: Narrative generation; creating highly convincing false narratives; manipulating public perception.
Impact on 5GW/Decision Driven ISR: Amplified cognitive manipulation; increased difficulty in distinguishing real from fake; exploitation of human biases.
Associated Challenges/Considerations: Ethical concerns; societal resilience; need for robust detection and fact-checking.
Neuromorphic Computing
Specific Application in ISR: Electronic warfare; ISR sensor processing; autonomous navigation; advanced sensor fusion.
Impact on 5GW/Decision Driven ISR: Faster, more efficient, and adaptable computation; mimicking human brain for complex problem-solving.
Associated Challenges/Considerations: Early stage development; integration with existing systems; specialized hardware requirements.
OSINT for Geolocation & Imagery Analysis
Specific Application in ISR: Tracking covert military movements; identifying troop buildups; exposing staging areas; verifying unauthorised dockings.
Impact on 5GW/Decision Driven ISR: Predictive intelligence; real-time situational awareness; unmasking "ghost vessels."
Associated Challenges/Considerations: Data veracity (user-generated content); attribution confidence; legal/privacy implications.
AI for Predictive Targeting & Resource Allocation
Specific Application in ISR: Automated threat prioritisation; pre-emptive engagement; optimising munition/EW resource deployment.
Impact on 5GW/Decision Driven ISR: Accelerated decision cycle; increased precision and efficiency in kinetic/non-kinetic effects.
Associated Challenges/Considerations: Ethical concerns (dehumanisation of ISR); over-reliance on imperfect assessments; human oversight.
Network-Mapping Tools (AI-driven)
Specific Application in ISR: Identifying bot-driven amplification; mapping cross-platform influence; exposing digital threat actors.
Impact on 5GW/Decision Driven ISR: Enhanced attribution; understanding adversary network structures; disrupting influence campaigns.
Associated Challenges/Considerations: Complexity of dynamic networks; evasion tactics by adversaries; data privacy.
AI-Assisted Decisioning Platforms
Specific Application in ISR: Integrating business rules, ML, generative AI for real-time, context-aware decisions; audit trails.
Impact on 5GW/Decision Driven ISR: Improved accuracy, consistency, adaptability, and explainability of decisions; faster deployment of logic.
Associated Challenges/Considerations: Responsible AI governance; trust calibration; potential for logic failures in production.
5. Conclusion: Towards Comprehensive Understanding and Strategic Advantage
The 2018 conceptualisation of Fifth Generation Warfare was remarkably prescient. The intervening years have not only confirmed its core tenets but have also seen an amplification of its characteristics, particularly the centrality of the cognitive mission space and the pervasive nature of grey zone influence operations. Modern conflict is a continuous, multi-dimensional competition, where strategic advantage is increasingly gained not through overwhelming kinetic force alone, but through the ability to understand, shape, and dominate the information and cognitive landscapes.
In this complex environment, Decision Drive ISR is not merely an enhancement but a fundamental requirement for success. It demands a holistic approach that seamlessly integrates intelligence across the physical, information, and cognitive dimensions of the battlespace. This integration provides comprehensive situational understanding, enabling rapid, accurate decision-making that accounts for both tangible effects and their intangible cognitive impacts.
The critical enablers for this transformation include the evolution to Multi-Domain ISR (MDISR) and Multi-Domain Command and Control (MDC2), which break down traditional service-specific silos to create a unified operational picture. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning are indispensable engines for processing the vast volumes of data, enabling predictive analysis, automated targeting, and sophisticated counter-influence operations. Open-Source Intelligence, amplified by AI, has become a frontline capability for detecting and attributing grey zone activities and information warfare campaigns.
Despite these technological advancements, significant challenges persist, including managing the sheer volume of data, mitigating the risk of "paralysis by analysis," and ensuring the resilience of interconnected networks. Crucially, the human element remains the ultimate determinant of success in 5GW. Highly trained operators, adaptable leaders capable of navigating ambiguity, and a resilient populace inoculated against sophisticated manipulation are indispensable. The effectiveness of AI-driven systems hinges on robust human-machine teaming, explainable AI, and strong ethical governance to ensure trust and accountability.
The imperative for nations is clear: to transform defence and intelligence capabilities to achieve comprehensive understanding and strategic advantage in the ongoing battle for the cognitive mission space. This transformation is not just a technological race but a fundamental shift in doctrine, organization, training, and leadership.
Recommendations
To further advance the understanding and application of Decision Drive ISR in Fifth Generation Warfare, the following areas warrant dedicated exploration:
· Deep Dive into the Affective Domain: A comprehensive analysis is needed to explore the "Affective Arena" in greater detail. This should include psychological principles, cultural nuances, and specific methodologies for assessing and influencing audience reception of information and actions. Understanding how messages are received and processed is critical for achieving desired cognitive effects.
· Ethical Framework for AI in Cognitive Warfare: As AI's role in intelligence and influence operations expands, there is an urgent need to develop robust ethical guidelines and responsible AI governance. This paper should address concerns highlighted by real-world cases, ensuring that the deployment of AI-driven capabilities aligns with ethical standards and international norms.
· Organizational Adaptation for MDISR: A practical report on the optimal organizational structures, training programs, and inter-agency collaboration models necessary to implement a truly integrated Multi-Domain ISR capability. This would provide actionable insights for defence and intelligence organizations seeking to transition from stove-piped to integrated operations.
· Measuring Cognitive Effect (MOE): Develop advanced methodologies and metrics for the Measurement of Effect (MOE) in the cognitive domain. This would move beyond traditional assessment of kinetic weapons effects to quantifiable changes in attitudes, behaviours, and the will of target audiences, providing a clearer understanding of operational progress in 5GW.
· Resilience and Counter-Influence Strategies: A dedicated paper focusing on national resilience strategies against foreign malign influence. This should encompass public education initiatives, media literacy programs, and the proactive development of counter-narratives to inoculate populations against sophisticated manipulation and strengthen societal cohesion.
Works cited
1. 5GW Section3.pdf
2. Information warfare - Wikipedia, accessed on July 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_warfare
3. OSINT in Gray Zone Warfare | Blog - Penlink, accessed on July 6, 2025, https://www.penlink.com/blog/osint-in-gray-zone-warfare/
4. A Primer on Russian Cognitive Warfare | Institute for the Study of War, accessed on July 6, 2025, https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/primer-russian-cognitive-warfare
5. Foreign Malign Influence Targeting U.S. and Allied Corporations - CSIS, accessed on July 6, 2025, https://www.csis.org/analysis/foreign-malign-influence-targeting-us-and-allied-corporations
6. The State(s) of Foreign Information Operations - Alliance For Securing Democracy, accessed on July 6, 2025, https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/The-States-of-Foreign-Information-Operations-ASD-at-GMF.pdf
7. Cognitive Warfare: The Invisible Frontline of Global Conflicts - Modern Diplomacy, accessed on July 6, 2025, https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2025/02/12/cognitive-warfare-the-invisible-frontline-of-global-conflicts/
8. Hybrid Warfare Helps Russia Level the Playing Field | Proceedings - U.S. Naval Institute, accessed on July 6, 2025, https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2018/august/hybrid-warfare-helps-russia-level-playing-field
9. Taiwan's Evolving Response to China's Grey Zone Actions - RUSI, accessed on July 6, 2025, https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/policy-briefs/taiwans-evolving-response-chinas-grey-zone-actions
10. War by all means: the rise of hybrid warfare - CIDOB, accessed on July 6, 2025, https://www.cidob.org/en/publications/war-all-means-rise-hybrid-warfare
11. Homeland Threat Assessment 2025, accessed on July 6, 2025, https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2024-10/24_0930_ia_24-320-ia-publication-2025-hta-final-30sep24-508.pdf
12. Significant Cyber Incidents | Strategic Technologies Program - CSIS, accessed on July 6, 2025, https://www.csis.org/programs/strategic-technologies-program/significant-cyber-incidents
13. Cyberwarfare: The new frontlines - Cybersecurity Guide, accessed on July 6, 2025, https://cybersecurityguide.org/resources/cyberwarfare/
14. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning - Parallax Advanced Research, accessed on July 6, 2025, https://parallaxresearch.org/artificial-intelligence-machine-learning
15. The Dehumanization of ISR: Israel's Use of Artificial Intelligence In Warfare, accessed on July 6, 2025, https://georgetownsecuritystudiesreview.org/2025/01/09/the-dehumanization-of-isr-israels-use-of-artificial-intelligence-in-warfare/
16. Misinformation & Fake News: Case Studies & Examples - LibGuides at Central Washington University, accessed on July 6, 2025, https://libguides.lib.cwu.edu/c.php?g=625394&p=4391900
17. Physical, Informational, Cognitive Dimensions | IPIA, accessed on July 6, 2025, https://www.ipia.au/theory-page-2
18. PD SAI hosts Multi-Domain Sensing System Assumption of Charter | Article - Army.mil, accessed on July 6, 2025, https://www.army.mil/article/284137/pd_sai_hosts_multi_domain_sensing_system_assumption_of_charter
19. Redefining warfare through information dominance - Daily Pioneer, accessed on July 6, 2025, https://www.dailypioneer.com/2025/columnists/redefining-warfare-through-information-dominance.html
20. OSINT Basics: What is OSINT?, accessed on July 6, 2025, https://www.osint.industries/post/osint-basics-what-is-osint
21. Tyrus Rodewald on the Future of Multi-INT ISR for Decision Advantage and Fusing Intelligence | Parallax Research, accessed on July 6, 2025, https://parallaxresearch.org/news/blog/tyrus-rodewald-future-multi-int-isr-decision-advantage-and-fusing-intelligence
22. The Influence Operation Ontology (IOO) -Working version 1.0- - arXiv, accessed on July 6, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2503.07304v1
23. ISR – An Integrated Approach in the 'Defence Year of Transformation' - Defstrat, accessed on July 6, 2025, https://www.defstrat.com/isr-an-integrated-approach-in-the-defence-year-of-transformation/
24. The Role of Multi-Domain Operations in Modern Warfare - ResearchGate, accessed on July 6, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373561307_The_Role_of_Multi-Domain_Operations_in_Modern_Warfare
25. The Future of AI Automated Decision Making: 2025 Trends to Watch - InRule, accessed on July 6, 2025, https://inrule.com/blog/ai-automated-decision-making-trends/
26. The Evolution of Hybrid Warfare: Implications for Strategy and the Military Profession, accessed on July 6, 2025, https://press.armywarcollege.edu/parameters/vol51/iss3/11/